In response to my criticism of the Straphangers’ Campaign during Albany’s fight over the fare hike, Gene Russianoff provides this response:
· · · · · · · ·
In a recent blog you write that the Straphangers Campaign “sat on our hands” during the recent battle over fare hikes and service cuts. That’s just not true. Below I lay out what we did and how it shaped the final outcome.
In December 2008, a State commission headed by former MTA Chairman Richard Ravitch issued a report laying out a program to provide the MTA with long-term stable funding, as well as providing incentives to use transit. The specific program called for $5 tolls on the currently “free” East and Harlem River Bridges, a far more modest fare hike than proposed by the MTA and a broad-based payroll tax imposed in the 12-county region served by the MTA. The message of the plan was simple: In a tough economy, transit needed help from those who benefited from the system: riders, drivers and businesses.
Also in December, the MTA proposed massive fare hikes – with the base fare going from $2.00 to $2.50 and the 30-day unlimited-ride MetroCard going from $81 to $103 – along with severe service cuts, including eliminating several subway lines and 20 bus routes.
Given the need for action, the Straphangers Campaign directed its efforts to educating the public on the need for new transit funding for the MTA. We did this in coalition, working with many other groups, including the Regional Plan Association, Tri-State Transportation Campaign, Transportation Alternatives, Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resource Defense Council and General Contractors Association.
We did a great deal of work, as described in this list below. We think it worked. One State Senator – Bill Perkins of Harlem – said he had never received so many letters and calls on one issue as he had on the fare hike. We:
1) Helped raise widespread public awareness of what we called “the mother of all fare hikes” and the proposed service cuts. For example, we asked the New York City Independent Budget Office to review the original MTA proposals. The IBO concluded (correctly) that a 30-day unlimited-ride MetroCard would go from $81 to a shocking $103. In addition, we convinced MTA to release numbers of what the fare box ratio (the percentage of expenses borne by riders) would be if “Doomsday” budget were adopted. It turned out that the fare box burden on subway riders would grow from 68% to 83% of expenses; in comparison the national average for large systems is 37%, according to the Federal Transit Administration. Our fact sheets on the MTA’s finances our web site, http://www.straphangers.org/fare.
2) Distributed 150,000 education leaflets to subway and bus riders and commuters between November and May, educating riders about the MTA financial crisis, including both its operating and capital needs. Published two fact sheets, one on proposed service cuts, one on the proposed fare hike; distributed at fare increase hearings.
3) Organized turnout for five MTA fare increase/service cut hearings in winter, 2009, with a strong emphasis on specific cuts in service. MTA officials reported a doubling in attendance and testimony from the 2007 fare hearings. Distributed talking points fact sheet at hearing.
4) Held three mock “funerals,” protesting MTA proposal to kill G, M, W and Z lines; public officials participated. The funerals included a bagpipe player, a wreath and eulogies.
5) Sent out 20 global e-mails to Straphangers e-mail list of 18,000. Posted breaking events and news clippings on Campaign website. Global emails were also send to our “fans” on Facebook.
6) Helped direct several events, including a rally in Union Square conducted with a group mounting a transit funding campaign on Facebook.
7) Talked with dozens of decision-makers and spent many days in Albany. Testified at hearing on Ravitch plan held by New York State Senate members Martin Malave Dilan and Bill Perkins.
8) Helped lead the effort for a $125,000 media outreach campaign with an ad on 3,000 subway cars for one month. (The ad can be found at: http://www.mrss.com/clients/knym-ad-pc-cmyk300ppi.pdf )
9) Testified during 17 public comments periods at MTA Board and committee meetings; held a dozen protests at MTA Board meetings.
10) Collected over 1,000 handwritten letters addressed to State Senators, Assembly Members and other State leaders.
In early May, the State adopted an MTA “bailout” program worth $1.8 billion annually. In many ways, it tracked the Ravitch program. Both plans called for $1.5 billion in a new payroll “mobility” tax; both called for a moderate fare increase; and both called for new taxes and fees on automobile use.
It is in this last part of the adopted plan that it differs from the Ravitch Commission proposal. Ravitch had called for a $5 toll on the East and Harlem River Bridges, although he had stated his support for a subsequent proposal for $2 tolls, which would have produced about $300 million annually. The final State bailout called for a similar amount of revenue from four sources: increased drivers license and registration fees, an increased automobile rental tax and a 50-cent taxicab drop off fee.
The impact on motor vehicle use of the tolls as opposed to the adopted measures is not fully known. That said, it is likely that it is not significant. In addition, the original plan for improved bus service – which included 300 new buses – was eliminated in the final plan.
Lastly, the final plan fully funds the MTA’s five-year capital program for only its first two years out of five. The issue will be back before the State, although the hope is that the economy will improve and that already-dedicated existing transit taxes will yield added revenues.
So there is a lot more transit work to do. And, as in the past, we – and others – will continue to do it.
· · · · · · · ·
I appreciate Gene’s response. With such a small staff and limited budget, the Straphangers’ Campaign got a lot done.
I think the issue here is not what was done (and I will gladly eat crow for being a bit dramatic in saying they “sat on their hands”), but what could have been done. There’s a huge number of people who would have gladly given their time and money to help in the fight to get Albany to fully fund the MTA, but nobody knew where to direct that energy. Many people – myself included – have discussed that they filled out a form on the Straphangers’ website during the spring to volunteer and never got a response.
Gene, there is a mass of people out there who support your cause, but there was nobody there to mobilize us. It’s fantastic that a State Senator received such an overwhelming number of letters. That’s proof that there is strength in numbers. But there are millions of transit riders each day in New York. When only a tiny fraction sign a petition or join a Facebook group, there is more that can be done. And that aside, there were a lot of people who were a little lost about what to do other than signing a petition or joining a Facebook group. (And the discussions within the Facebook group amounted to little more than MTA-bashing with virtually no response from the Straphangers’ Campaign.)
I think the general message among people passionate about transit is: we wanted to help. We wanted to help collect more than 1,000 signatures. Surely, there are more outraged people than that. We wanted to help with leafletting and educating riders and making sure they were directing their anger at the right people. When we couldn’t go to Albany because of work commitments, we wanted to make sure those buses were full of our fellow riders. We wanted to help, but we weren’t given the option to help. And the end result was frustrating, because it was a half-baked plan that will leave riders frustrated again when the MTA is facing another deficit next year. Our collective voice on blogs or in comments could’ve been put to good use, but we felt like we were all left on the sidelines with nowhere else to go.
It’s clear that the Straphangers’ Campaign did a lot of legwork, but we want to do some of the legwork for you. Next time, please let us help.